The phonetics of newly derived words: Testing the effect of morphological segmentability on affix duration

dc.contributor.authorPlag, Ingo
dc.contributor.authorBen Hedia, Sonia
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-11T15:24:45Z
dc.date.available2019-04-11T15:24:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractNewly derived morphologically complex words have played a prominent role in research on morphological productivity and lexical innovation (e.g. Baayen 1989, 1996; Plag 1999; Mühleisen 2010). Most of the attention concerning the properties of such words has been devoted to their phonological, morphological, semantic and syntactic properties (see, for example, Bauer et al. 2013 for such analyses). This paper takes a look at the phonetic properties of affixed words, testing Hay’s (2003) ‘segmentability hypothesis’, according to which newly derived words are expected to show less phonetic integration, hence less phonetic reduction, of the affix involved than established forms. This hypothesis is based on the idea that morphological segmentability negatively correlates with phonological integration. To date there is only one study that clearly confirmed the segmentability hypothesis (i.e. Hay 2007), while other studies have failed to replicate the effect (see Hanique and Ernestus 2012 for an overview). The present study investigates the issue with data from the Switchboard corpus for five affixes of English: un-, locative in-, negative in-, dis- and adverbial -ly. Using different measures of morphological segmentability, we demonstrate that the durations of the two prefixes un- and dis- (unlike the durations of in- and -ly) largely support the segmentability hypothesis. With un- and dis- prefixed words, prefixes that are more easily segmentable have longer durations.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was partially funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgmeinschaft (Research Unit FOR2373 ‘Spoken Morphology’, Projects PL 151/7–1 and PL 151/8–1) and the Strategischer Forschungsfonds der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, which we gratefully acknowledge.en
dc.identifier.citationPlag, Ingo & Sonia Ben Hedia. 2018. The phonetics of newly derived words: Testing the effect of morphological segmentability on affix duration. In Sabine Arndt-Lappe, Angelika Braun, Claudine Moulin & Esme Winter-Froemel (eds.), Expanding the Lexicon: Linguistic Innovation, Morphological Productivity, and the Role of Discourse-related Factors, 93–116. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter Mouton.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://researchdata.hhu.de/handle/entry/69
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25838/d5p-6
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherHHUen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectlinguisticsen
dc.subjectmorphologyen
dc.subjectphonologyen
dc.subjectphoneticsen
dc.subjectmorphological segmentabilityen
dc.subjectspeech productionen
dc.subjectaffixesen
dc.subjectEnglishen
dc.titleThe phonetics of newly derived words: Testing the effect of morphological segmentability on affix durationen
dc.typeOtheren

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 5 of 11
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Plag & Ben Hedia 2018.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
dis_items_AE_median_without_zeros_simple.csv
Size:
1.34 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
in- duration.r
Size:
49.28 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
-ly duration.r
Size:
47.17 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
GemDataR_2015_09_10.csv
Size:
162.24 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.32 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: