Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The phonetics of newly derived words: Testing the effect of morphological segmentability on affix duration
Authors: Plag, Ingo
Ben Hedia, Sonia
Keywords: linguistics
morphological segmentability
speech production
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: HHU
Citation: Plag, Ingo & Sonia Ben Hedia. 2018. The phonetics of newly derived words: Testing the effect of morphological segmentability on affix duration. In Sabine Arndt-Lappe, Angelika Braun, Claudine Moulin & Esme Winter-Froemel (eds.), Expanding the Lexicon: Linguistic Innovation, Morphological Productivity, and the Role of Discourse-related Factors, 93–116. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter Mouton.
Abstract: Newly derived morphologically complex words have played a prominent role in research on morphological productivity and lexical innovation (e.g. Baayen 1989, 1996; Plag 1999; Mühleisen 2010). Most of the attention concerning the properties of such words has been devoted to their phonological, morphological, semantic and syntactic properties (see, for example, Bauer et al. 2013 for such analyses). This paper takes a look at the phonetic properties of affixed words, testing Hay’s (2003) ‘segmentability hypothesis’, according to which newly derived words are expected to show less phonetic integration, hence less phonetic reduction, of the affix involved than established forms. This hypothesis is based on the idea that morphological segmentability negatively correlates with phonological integration. To date there is only one study that clearly confirmed the segmentability hypothesis (i.e. Hay 2007), while other studies have failed to replicate the effect (see Hanique and Ernestus 2012 for an overview). The present study investigates the issue with data from the Switchboard corpus for five affixes of English: un-, locative in-, negative in-, dis- and adverbial -ly. Using different measures of morphological segmentability, we demonstrate that the durations of the two prefixes un- and dis- (unlike the durations of in- and -ly) largely support the segmentability hypothesis. With un- and dis- prefixed words, prefixes that are more easily segmentable have longer durations.
Appears in Collections:VAR Morpho-phonetic Variation in English

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Plag & Ben Hedia 2018.pdf1.11 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
dis_items_AE_median_without_zeros_simple.csv1.34 kBUnknownView/Open
in- duration.r49.28 kBUnknownView/Open
-ly duration.r47.17 kBUnknownView/Open
GemDataR_2015_09_10.csv162.24 kBUnknownView/Open
rating_1_items_AE_median_simple.csv2.01 kBUnknownView/Open
type_of_root.csv1.65 kBUnknownView/Open
rating_2_items_AE_median_simple.csv1.97 kBUnknownView/Open
un- duration.r39.44 kBUnknownView/Open
dis data all for prefix duration w type of base.csv52.28 kBUnknownView/Open
dis- duration with all items.R30.93 kBUnknownView/Open
Show full item record

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons